Yesterday, a day which arrived after 6 decades, There had been many events/incidents/accidents over the 60 years...the case proceeded on and on...and there were things happening. Then the day came and the decision as well -
Whether the disputed site is the birth place of Bhagwan Ram?
The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram. Place of birth is a juristic person and is a deity. It is personified as the
spirit of divine worshipped as birth place of Lord Rama as a child. Spirit of divine ever remains present every where at all times for any one to invoke at any shape or form in accordance with his own aspirations and it can be shapeless and formless also.
Whether the disputed building was a mosque? When was it built? By whom?
The disputed building was constructed by Babar, the year is not certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus, it cannot have the character of a mosque.
Whether the mosque was built after demolishing a Hindu temple?
The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old structure after demolition of the same. The Archaeological Survey of India has proved that the structure was a massive Hindu religious structure.
Whether the idols were placed in the building on the night of December 22/23rd, 1949?
The idols were placed in the middle dome of the disputed structure in the intervening night of 22/23.12.1949.
Whether any of the claims for title is time barred?
O.O.S. No. 4 of 1989, the Sunni Central Board of Waqfs
U.P., Lucknow and others Vs. Gopal Singh Visharad and others and O.O.S. No.3 of 1989, Nirmohi Akhara and Another Vs. Sri Jamuna Prasad Singh and others are barred by time.
What will be the status of the disputed site e.g. inner and and outer courtyard?
It is established that the property in suit is the site of Janm Bhumi of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general had the right to worship Charan, Sita Rasoi, other idols and other object of worship existed upon the property in suit. It is also established that Hindus have been worshipping the place in dispute as Janm Sthan i.e. a birth place as deity and visiting it as a sacred place of pilgrimage as of right since time immemorial.
After the construction of the disputed structure it is proved the deities were installed inside the disputed structure on 22/23.12.1949. It is also proved that the outer courtyard was in exclusive possession of Hindus and they were worshipping throughout and in the inner courtyard (in the disputed structure) they were also worshipping. It is also established that the disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Islam.
The judges have also said that the status quo should be maintained at the site for three months. The full judgment runs into 8,000 pages.
Source : http://www.rediff.com/
I welcome the verdict.....and remember some lines...
राम दरबार है जग सारा
राम ही तीनों लोक के राजा...
राम ही तीनों लोक के स्वामी
राम दरबार है जग सारा !!
Till now, Indians have taken the verdict very positively and our muslim citizens have also shown a lot of faith in the decision from High Court....It's a moment of pleasure...deliriousness...hence there need to be a great control on emotions. RSS has set example when they restricted their workers celebrating the moment too great extent and opted just to distribute sweets.
I always felt bad when people raised doubts on Sri Ram's existence....Even few of Hindu leaders tried to become secular giving similar opinion....shame on them..what else I can say ! Let the leftist rest in peace ;-)
Kudos to GANGA JAMUNA culture....
राम दरबार है जग सारा !
